Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW1IJ-0001k0-9i for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:37:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW1II-0007YV-Sp for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:37:54 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW1IH-0007Xn-L0 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:37:53 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW1IF-0008LZ-6C for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:37:52 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0ODblEw013435; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:37:47 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Craig Ringer cc: Andres Freund , Yuriy Zhuravlev , Michael Paquier , PostgreSQL mailing lists , Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2 In-reply-to: References: <29526280-50e2-495b-99e1-ccd4e16ffd05@postgrespro.ru> <5a8a9610-722f-49df-b609-35842fe4c8d6@postgrespro.ru> <0d8bf7e7-db42-44d8-aac5-65ff407cb60f@postgrespro.ru> <22f10946-860e-031e-4440-5aaf67c938a4@2ndquadrant.com> <20170124065848.yawgnrpqihvahj5u@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Craig Ringer message dated "Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:27:58 +0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <13433.1485265067.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:37:47 -0500 Message-ID: <13434.1485265067@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Craig Ringer writes: > Personally I think we should aim to have this in as a non default build > mode in pg10 if it can be made ready, and aim to make it default in pg11 at > least for Windows. AFAIK we haven't committed to accepting this at all, let alone trying to do so on a tight schedule. And I believe there was general agreement that we would not accept it as something to maintain in parallel with the existing makefiles. If we have to maintain two build systems, we have that already. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers