Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0QwH-00070H-UB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:32:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0QwG-0004n6-Rs for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:32:04 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0QwG-0004mx-IE for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:32:04 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0QwE-0001ge-Hw for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:32:03 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2AUHVtYD1360530; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:31:55 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Bruce Momjian , Peter Eisentraut , Laurenz Albe , Simon Riggs , Robert Treat , Erik Rijkers , Justin Pryzby , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes In-reply-to: <20221130172022.yxtohqbzvosa4f7g@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20221130172022.yxtohqbzvosa4f7g@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:20:22 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1360528.1669829515.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:31:55 -0500 Message-ID: <1360529.1669829515@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > I find it a bit shocking to have had it backpatched, even to 15 -- a > whole chapter in the documentation? I don't see why it wouldn't be > treated like any other "major feature" patch, which we only consider for > the development branch. Also, this is a first cut -- presumably we'll > want to copy-edit it before it becomes released material. I think that last point is fairly convincing. I've not read the new material, but I didn't get further than the first line of the new chapter file before noting a copy-and-paste error: --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/src/sgml/xact.sgml @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ + That doesn't leave me with a warm feeling that it's ready to ship. I too vote for reverting it out of the released branches. regards, tom lane