From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>,
        Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
        Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>,
        Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
        Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
        Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>,
        David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
        Maxim Orlov <m.orlov@postgrespro.ru>, lubennikovaav@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
In-reply-to: <CAPpHfdvxK+KSDqopaVdmCHgbO92AN4ibrbiCJ6i6-+g4oma-6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALT9ZEG9Zk5TxuDTnZPGe9H+b7DL40gXfeouWCaZ3A70yvyWLw@mail.gmail.com> <CALT9ZEG1YAfPBH-ZMnK-cxu0SDdrV_w0QEBs9BLHfWvddpOHFA@mail.gmail.com> <20220922151328.lakwdytvwnyyif3b@awork3.anarazel.de> <CACG=ezbRVZrdTguWphiFP-L2cCi_jy+spZA0wPJWA806B0=2dQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACG=ezYk7up-BUL30SrGozURYWt97BK2f=XhUL6S+qU3F9qVzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ7c6TOe-ifS9JAqhk-5rPrAbnfGkxNYQiWnR6CUaAqLP31T6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPpHfduqJ9QCOrXDjkPxPRxJRws1FgFELwB2Yz3L6-n7FQMsrA@mail.gmail.com> <8c74cc5e-4b97-4cd7-9aaf-67886822a78c@eisentraut.org> <CAPpHfdvY7UitNMgUKVx73+W_6STCRoiRBmoE2t7WP1-KBodT+g@mail.gmail.com> <CALT9ZEFY-vsL4-cxta49wP=H7RjDaZk+Wg-ft4m-kVS_=WMsAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240501022412.85@rfd.leadboat.com> <CAPpHfdsLcQ2w24r9CCNVwaDwKMXabQzG15KwSaaqMAczF1DdVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPpHfdvxK+KSDqopaVdmCHgbO92AN4ibrbiCJ6i6-+g4oma-6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
	message dated "Fri, 10 May 2024 03:11:41 +0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1375613.1715301775.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 20:42:55 -0400
Message-ID: <1375614.1715301775@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1375614.1715301775%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> The revised patchset is attached.  I applied cosmetical changes.  I'm
> going to push it if no objections.

Is this really suitable material to be pushing post-feature-freeze?
It doesn't look like it's fixing any new-in-v17 issues.

			regards, tom lane