Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sqQz2-009hjh-Hk for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 05:42:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sqQz2-0054vo-4M for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 05:42:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sqQz1-0054tq-QU for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 05:42:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sqQyy-001aZ9-P6 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 05:42:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 48H5gZIk1399311; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:42:35 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Sven Klemm cc: Wolfgang Walther , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b In-reply-to: References: <0a997455-5aba-4cf2-a354-d26d8bcbfae6@technowledgy.de> <441306.1726346239@sss.pgh.pa.us> <38e73fef-f19b-4835-b353-a110db6c8318@technowledgy.de> <1043017.1726463364@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1156795.1726499982@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Sven Klemm message dated "Tue, 17 Sep 2024 07:38:15 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <1399309.1726551755.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:42:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1399310.1726551755@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Sven Klemm writes: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 5:19 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> Configurable to what? If your test cases are dependent on the >> historical behavior of PST8PDT, you're out of luck, because that >> simply isn't available anymore (or won't be once 2024b reaches >> your platform, anyway). > I was wondering whether the timezone used by pg_regress could be made > configurable. Yes, I understood that you were suggesting that. My point is that it wouldn't do you any good: you will still have to change any regression test cases that depend on behavior PST8PDT has/had that is different from America/Los_Angeles. That being the case, I don't see much value in making it configurable. regards, tom lane