public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:26:06 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYmi+nqM3iH-huvAMkGhfG-JpZCUSB=wQPqAK-wxZjtBSmC_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOYmi+nVsoMRFp4u0oQ66-oPT6+NNAfhLvk5htthY5zkUOnbfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAOYmi+nqM3iH-huvAMkGhfG-JpZCUSB=wQPqAK-wxZjtBSmC_w@mail.gmail.com>

Jacob Champion <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 2:22 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> so it kind of doesn't
>> matter today whether we set N to 2 or 3.

> I think it still matters for impending decisions. For example, we're
> about to engineer how to backport a sliding window of Python across
> the sliding window of backbranch support. Shorter windows tie our
> hands less.

I dunno.  One of the points of the allegedly-agreed-to policy
framework was

>>> 2) We don't remove support for OS versions in minor releases

A strict reading of that is that a released branch can't increase
its minimum required Python version.

Now maybe we can finesse that, like "you can build PL/Python and
associated contrib modules with Python >= X, but if you want to
run these optional tests, they require Python >= Y".  Not sure
how comfortable I am with that.  I definitely don't want to get
into a situation where we require buildfarm owners to have
Python >= Y installed, because then we will not have any testing
that proves we didn't break the other part.  (So we'd need a
runtime check to skip these tests on too-old Python.)

In any case, if we do make such a decision, most likely we'd
use the same value of Y for all the active back branches.
So I think the value of N in the support policy really
only matters for future version-cutoff decisions.

			regards, tom lane






view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox