Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHuDd-0006g1-NN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:05:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHuDb-0007Mw-NJ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:05:07 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHuDb-0007Mp-GT for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:05:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHuDV-0007Ji-82 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:05:06 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 124K4qKT1410155; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:04:52 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Heikki Linnakangas cc: Michael Paquier , Alvaro Herrera , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Removing support for COPY FROM STDIN in protocol version 2 In-reply-to: <8a174f9b-59e4-e231-5b66-1f01b314882a@iki.fi> References: <20210203160958.GA2341@alvherre.pgsql> <3921698.1612369777@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6d6dcead-71fa-d9f6-4aaa-41104af0f27c@iki.fi> <1318732.1614814378@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8a174f9b-59e4-e231-5b66-1f01b314882a@iki.fi> Comments: In-reply-to Heikki Linnakangas message dated "Thu, 04 Mar 2021 10:59:41 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1410153.1614888292.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:04:52 -0500 Message-ID: <1410154.1614888292@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Heikki Linnakangas writes: >> I concur that 0001 attached is committable. I have not looked at >> your 0002, though. > Removed the entry from nls.mk, and pushed 0001. Thanks! It seems that buildfarm member walleye doesn't like this. Since nothing else is complaining, I confess bafflement as to why. walleye seems to be our only active mingw animal, so maybe there's a platform dependency somewhere ... but how would (mostly) removal of code expose that? regards, tom lane