Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1waQ05-001ms6-0G for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 03:34:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1waQ02-00EqbG-0P for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 03:34:34 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1waQ01-00Eqb8-2j for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 03:34:33 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1waPzz-00000001CxN-2Lxs for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 03:34:33 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 65J3YRPC1422593; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:34:27 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: David Rowley cc: Chao Li , Peter Eisentraut , Andres Freund , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Fix tuple deformation with virtual generated NOT NULL columns In-reply-to: References: <1151393.1781734980@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1174236.1781736349@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2A622929-A45C-4370-943A-BC76FF4CC433@gmail.com> <03C47613-5C89-4E69-BB72-3B2912BDDDA8@gmail.com> <96A79F87-ACDF-479F-B69D-0CACB7085C97@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley message dated "Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:30:11 +1200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1422591.1781840067.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:34:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1422592.1781840067@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk David Rowley writes: > For the v18 version, I included the tests added by 1f7dfe8c8 in the > same commit. I did it that way so as not to briefly introduce a test > that would fail into REL_18_STABLE. +1, doing it the other way would create a landmine for git-bisect testing. regards, tom lane