Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOZkb-00035d-Ci for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 03:29:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOZjc-0008MU-4R for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 03:28:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOZjb-0008GI-Mh for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 03:28:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOZjZ-0005OR-G1 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 03:28:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x493SZoP014252; Wed, 8 May 2019 23:28:35 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY In-reply-to: <20190508130538.GB3712@paquier.xyz> References: <23694.1556806002@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190504085543.GE2174@paquier.xyz> <4469.1556982011@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190505141645.GA7392@paquier.xyz> <16468.1557077559@sss.pgh.pa.us> <21697.1557092753@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2321.1557263978@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190508075853.GC1602@paquier.xyz> <21629.1557318714@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190508130538.GB3712@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Wed, 08 May 2019 22:05:38 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14250.1557372515.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 23:28:35 -0400 Message-ID: <14251.1557372515@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > No problem to do that. I'll brush up all that once you commit the > first piece you have come up with, and reuse the new API of catalog.c > you are introducing based on the table OID. Pushed my stuff, have at it. regards, tom lane