Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7CSB-0000v3-Ac for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:38:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7CS9-0005jo-E1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:38:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7CS9-0005jg-3U for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:38:33 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7CS6-0007Sm-G5 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:38:31 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w924bnHC014315; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 00:37:49 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Amit Kapila cc: Thomas Munro , PostgreSQL Hackers , hlinnaka Subject: Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment In-reply-to: References: <11629.1536550032@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8352.1536586500@sss.pgh.pa.us> <27748.1538425312@sss.pgh.pa.us> <28627.1538426947@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4694.1538438514@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8134.1538444333@sss.pgh.pa.us> <12777.1538452350@sss.pgh.pa.us> <13340.1538453286@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Amit Kapila message dated "Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:56:37 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14313.1538455069.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:37:49 -0400 Message-ID: <14314.1538455069@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Amit Kapila writes: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane wrote: >> (But it might be worth choosing slightly less >> generic object names, to avoid a conflict against other sub-tests >> later in that script.) > The function name and statement name seems okay to me. How about > changing the table name to fooarr or arrtest? Up to you. regards, tom lane