Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lI1gu-0005Up-DD for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 04:03:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lI1gt-0002iM-4D for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 04:03:51 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lI1fR-0007RI-G1 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 04:02:21 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lI1fK-0002gg-SV for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 04:02:20 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 125429Ru1437509; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 23:02:09 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Geoghegan cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi , PostgreSQL Hackers , Craig Ringer , Robert Haas Subject: Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails In-reply-to: References: <20210305.115011.558061052471425531.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> <1436448.1614915141@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Geoghegan message dated "Thu, 04 Mar 2021 19:41:06 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1437507.1614916929.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 23:02:09 -0500 Message-ID: <1437508.1614916929@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Peter Geoghegan writes: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:32 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmmm ... what environment is that? This test script hasn't changed >> meaningfully in several years, and we have not seen any real issues >> with it up to now. > Did you see this recent thread? > https://postgr.es/m/20210208215206.mqmrnpkaqrdtm7fj@alap3.anarazel.de Hadn't paid much attention at the time, but yeah, it looks like Andres tripped over some variant of this. I'd be kind of inclined to remove this test script altogether, on the grounds that it's wasting cycles on a function that doesn't really do what is claimed (and we should remove the documentation claim, too). Having said that, it's still true that this test has been stable in the buildfarm. Andres explained what he had to perturb to make it fail, so I'm still interested in what Horiguchi-san did to break it. regards, tom lane