Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTRIv-0005jH-FB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTRIu-0000n3-Du for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:15:04 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTRIu-0000mu-4f for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:15:04 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTRIs-0007CJ-2Q for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:15:03 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 27VHEuZx014815; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:14:56 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Andres Freund , "Jonathan S. Katz" , Andrew Dunstan , Amit Langote , Nikita Glukhov , Alvaro Herrera , PostgreSQL Hackers , Michael Paquier , John Naylor Subject: Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 In-reply-to: References: <20220830092008.6dbublx6la226zis@alvherre.pgsql> <2276d20d-43ff-f9f6-5c9c-c2875739e66c@postgresql.org> <20220831154916.pgspuz3bp4427int@awork3.anarazel.de> <4151123.1661961884@sss.pgh.pa.us> <13351.1661965592@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:09:51 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14813.1661966096.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:14:56 -0400 Message-ID: <14814.1661966096@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Robert Haas writes: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:06 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> (I don't say that we'd convert every datatype to do so right away; >> in the long run we should, but I'm content to start with just the >> same core types touched here.) > I would be in favor of making more of an effort than just a few token > data types. The initial patch could just touch a few, but once the > infrastructure is in place we should really make a sweep through the > tree and tidy up. Sure, but my point is that we can do that in a time-extended fashion rather than having a flag day where everything must be updated. The initial patch just needs to update a few types as proof of concept. regards, tom lane