From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
        Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
        Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>,
        Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
        pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
        Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
        pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: \dP and \dX use ::regclass without "pg_catalog."
In-reply-to: <202201081950.teiyz4ic43oi@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <202201081950.teiyz4ic43oi@alvherre.pgsql>
Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera
 <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
	message dated "Sat, 08 Jan 2022 16:50:19 -0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1581829.1641672219.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 15:03:39 -0500
Message-ID: <1581830.1641672219@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1581830.1641672219%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> My point is that it's good to have it, but it would be much better to
> have something bulletproof, which we could use in an automated check
> somewhere (next to stuff like perlcritic, perhaps).  I don't know what,
> though.

Meh ... this is mostly cosmetic these days, so I can't get excited
about putting a lot of work into it.  We disclaimed search path
bulletproofness for all these queries a long time ago.

I don't object to fixing it in the name of consistency, but that's
not a reason to invest large effort.

			regards, tom lane