Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1kctQr-0006Bw-98
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:57:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1kctQq-00023m-7h
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:57:16 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>)
	id 1kctQq-00023f-0h
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:57:16 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>)
	id 1kctQh-0004rN-VX
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:57:14 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603FF229BF876
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:57:06 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:57:06 -0700 (MST)
From: legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1605113826391-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <024ba056-6b4f-b26c-af17-297c1bbca65a@postgrespro.ru>
References: 
 <CA+hUKG+2ze0_kcZt9AAUDufP0cNL+jtS5BsTmys3c-9S3Ecfng@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200909092752.c91758a1bec3479668e82643@sraoss.co.jp>
 <CA+hUKG+3x4pmGNrwAn73EGwa5bJH0HbnkfjynJ=_nyvAUbx0Ag@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200917.094245.433560970731138050.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
 <20201001033426.GB8130@paquier.xyz>
 <20201001.130351.116296702183559169.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
 <497aa257-ecad-e439-39b3-944ab08d6fb9@oss.nttdata.com>
 <20201001140627.1f8fafe595f545e026d110c6@sraoss.co.jp>
 <20201005181618.31f2baf8583358fcfbed26cd@sraoss.co.jp>
 <024ba056-6b4f-b26c-af17-297c1bbca65a@postgrespro.ru>
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Precedence: bulk

Hello Konstantin,
I remember testing it with pg_stat_statements (and planning counters
enabled). Maybe identifying internal queries associated with this (simple)
test case, could help dev team ?
Regards
PAscal



--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html