Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1jA0Bd-0003Qj-Qd
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 23:45:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1jA0Bc-0000V2-Jz
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 23:45:52 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1jA0Bc-0000Uv-B1
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 23:45:52 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1jA0BV-0005RW-Tn
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 23:45:51 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 025Njbpc016089;
	Thu, 5 Mar 2020 18:45:37 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
        Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
        Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Shaun Thomas <shaun.thomas@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>,
        PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
        Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
In-reply-to: 
 <CAAaqYe_Rr4o24RdixZqStymRed5LeUzcq19HdeCXXhpLs90tpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAaqYe9szJ9=a-ayZUuLbV8rBh3YYgxtCHzdh5Mo2xMS7NL=rQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190721113422.hjubqs45xxpnldn7@development>
 <20190730001711.hprrcx3ntk57wuqv@development>
 <CA+FpmFfEJZ=obUpjgXO5u3T1yzqPh3CPsyfjhEN9_L31NDPHqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190904191710.gogtnktjbvtg5zq3@development>
 <20190909215538.42hrv6j4z5ztcft4@development>
 <CAAaqYe-L4a2mj=AqguVjdkf65LZ772C-GbKgAj7CQro8rftXBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190928230049.k4l2mayun7jomhxy@development>
 <20191129060146.GH2505@paquier.xyz>
 <20191201004716.cenkc33em2lnrrdl@development>
 <20200121142529.wpickvfefp7lok4p@development>
 <CAAaqYe-=w0RaadtaTxfwuVa7GK+8QS7D51YzmfJLX9YZGfqc4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAaqYe_kpBUEkKXLRYfspu05p0wgj_n3_tORStDfCvLUpWUbRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <13718.1583448772@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAAaqYe_Rr4o24RdixZqStymRed5LeUzcq19HdeCXXhpLs90tpg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 05 Mar 2020 18:37:56 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <16087.1583451937.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 18:45:37 -0500
Message-ID: <16088.1583451937@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Precedence: bulk

James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> writes:
> That's what I figured, but as I mentioned I've having trouble figuring out
> how the fact that an analyze is in flight is determined. I assume it's
> something that lives of the EState or similar, but I'm not seeing anything
> obvious.

AFAIR, it's just whether or not the current planstate node has an
instrumentation struct attached.

			regards, tom lane