From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>,
        PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
In-reply-to: <Zj6PvZWzkTsCwNMS@momjian.us>
References: <ZjxLJpnH4VMkOMmi@momjian.us> <CAGECzQTz5aUqLEL6daLd2Hu2FXS_LOSh4keDndJ1fwThsb_b5w@mail.gmail.com> <Zj6PvZWzkTsCwNMS@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Fri, 10 May 2024 17:21:01 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1641605.1715376693.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 17:31:33 -0400
Message-ID: <1641606.1715376693@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1641606.1715376693%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>> There are two commits that I think would benefit from being listed
>> (but maybe they are already listed and I somehow missed them, or they
>> are left out on purpose for some reason):

> I looked at both of these.   In both cases I didn't see why the user
> would need to know these changes were made:

I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
is user-visible.  People might have internalized the fact that
it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.

			regards, tom lane