Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nfNnY-0007rn-Om for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:23:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nfNnX-00070U-EV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:23:47 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nfNnX-00070L-4k for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:23:47 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nfNnV-0006h2-0T for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:23:46 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 23FFNesq1643687; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:23:40 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Noah Misch , Peter Geoghegan , David Rowley , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse In-reply-to: <1637671.1650032132@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1521388.1649953580@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1547912.1649971995@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1553951.1649975018@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1570894.1649986347@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220415015249.kfsqxujrf2bn2wz6@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220415024515.GA862547@rfd.leadboat.com> <20220415051205.6abhlilh6fnjgohr@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220415052125.GD862547@rfd.leadboat.com> <1637671.1650032132@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:15:32 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1643685.1650036220.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:23:40 -0400 Message-ID: <1643686.1650036220@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > So there's no longer any doubt that something is holding back OldestXmin. > I will go put some instrumentation into the code that's computing that. The something is the logical replication launcher. In the failing runs, it is advertising xmin = 724 (the post-initdb NextXID) and continues to do so well past the point where tenk1 gets vacuumed. Discuss. regards, tom lane