Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqmS-0001Xu-K7 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 07:46:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqmR-0000kL-4I for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 07:46:43 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqmQ-0000kC-RX for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 07:46:42 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqmO-0000M4-IK for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 07:46:41 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3137ka1Y1647864; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 02:46:36 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Andres Freund , Nathan Bossart , Robert Haas , Michael Paquier , Fujii Masao , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15 In-reply-to: References: <20230201165801.33ydbxvjdbomjqa7@alap3.anarazel.de> <20230201175806.GA3199959@nathanxps13> <20230201223555.GA3721373@nathanxps13> <1449633.1675305284@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20230202200957.GA3944544@nathanxps13> <20230202220113.GA3945808@nathanxps13> <20230202223919.GA3947443@nathanxps13> <20230203073529.kspdvlctockqx5a2@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:42:07 +1300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1647862.1675410396.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:46:36 -0500 Message-ID: <1647863.1675410396@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:35 PM Andres Freund wrote: >> we don't have a hard dependency on setsid() > FTR There are no Unixes without setsid()... Yeah. What I just got done reading in SUSv2 (1997) is "Derived from the POSIX.1-1988 standard". We need not concern ourselves with any systems not having it. regards, tom lane