public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
Cc: Alena Rybakina <[email protected]>
Cc: jian he <[email protected]>
Cc: Nikolay Shaplov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Marcos Pegoraro <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 12:02:10 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-WzmOTRYPkw0H9y+QRWeoeDMgAahs6zxD=CpiPkOMB8=NJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CAPpHfduFJHTNGCTFWt4GFs-E6Ts8xS5mCsKOYKBsZAmoOr8ZSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAPpHfdtR3cBKCSj_7dd7EDF_pa-rUUQBx3-guK6kZZ=_hSeMfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAPpHfdvF864n=Lzmjd2XBi9TwboZvrhRtLSt2hCP+JVUv6XKzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACJufxHCJvC3X8nUK-jRvRru-ZEXp16EBPADOwTGaqmOYM1Raw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAPpHfduBA9RXa1LQAz=wFK8cGx_AaHVK_vnNqCnG4yA7KwFf7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAPpHfds4wGdWQ2xx1OUKZC4ggqS6Q=cBSck9Re1ajY0ESkwcmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdswA8ucBOuyf6GEn93ffC-oG7EjuvRprXx5Zc7Qdgafqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-WznLiw20U_Tp8Otm=g7hGcfWnodM4EOGzV=F3W-EvfQDTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1d5131fc-cd6c-4f61-8ba0-e61c518b! [email protected]>
	<CAPpHfdvmS2i13p4jzPG+tc-KpfBJedtmf1vP5tVJhZVRawJdRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-WznZYg=w1uuNoZ9Y4+ar1h2FeWj+muKBSs46Ab0zqU7mLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdsHUr7X8xLKqK6PWNCXRa7GOiBQ4Ge=n46YGjNAPXPp6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-Wzn4wMQ5=Y3Z-nkS-ujvibpvMuGSGD_=wVnxC2qDo=+U_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoZjAgTgM=uYFp1wJN4vUz0__nT5krtfBrQ24YG0YRWT5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-WzmOTRYPkw0H9y+QRWeoeDMgAahs6zxD=CpiPkOMB8=NJg@mail.gmail.com>

Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> writes:
> To be clear, I don't think that it's essential that we have equivalent
> behavior in those cases where the patch applies its transformations. I
> have no objections to committing the patch without any handling for
> that.

Oy.  I don't agree with that *at all*.  An "optimization" that changes
query semantics is going to be widely seen as a bug.

			regards, tom lane






view thread (78+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox