Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzL0-000GAx-5H for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:26:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzKy-008YzF-Q6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:26:56 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzKy-008Yz7-Fx for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:26:56 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzKv-0040vr-Sw for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:26:55 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4AQHQpnu1687802; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:26:51 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Misleading "epoll_create1 failed: Too many open files" In-reply-to: References: <1682220.1732638956@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:21:21 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1687800.1732642011.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:26:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1687801.1732642011@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > On 2024-11-26 11:35:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> You should probably check all of 3d475515a, because I think >> I applied the same idea in more than one place. > Yea, there's another equivalent message for kqueue a few lines below. You should remove the "treat this..." comments, because those were precisely about not making a distinction in the messages. Otherwise okay with me. regards, tom lane