Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzZP-000Hkc-4B for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:41:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzZN-008fbo-Hm for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:41:49 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzZN-008fYO-7p for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:41:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFzZF-004B3F-PT; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:41:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4AQHfbJX1689263; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:41:37 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: Tatsuo Ishii , nagata@sraoss.co.jp, peter@eisentraut.org, daniel@yesql.se, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Doc: typo in config.sgml In-reply-to: References: <20241119112907.1cdfe086df16e7ac173f9571@sraoss.co.jp> <20241119193121.7ba727c489b5f0b6d20f9c25@sraoss.co.jp> <20241126.182513.1752581942460106099.ishii@postgresql.org> <1682864.1732639382@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:08:54 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1689261.1732642897.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:41:37 -0500 Message-ID: <1689262.1732642897@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 11:43:02AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I don't think this patch is doing anything I want at all. > Gee, I kind of liked the patch, but maybe you didn't like the additional > complexity to check the PDF output twice, once on input (complex) and > once on output. The attached patch only does the output check. It's still not doing anything I want at all. I'm with Tatsuo on this: I do not want the makefiles deciding for me which warnings are acceptable. regards, tom lane