Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkeqG-0006EG-RY for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:09:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkeqG-0005yS-ED for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:09:12 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkeqF-0005w8-Fo for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:09:11 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkeqC-0003ls-Rw for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:09:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8FM8nnj017026; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:08:49 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andreas Karlsson cc: Alvaro Herrera , Christoph Berg , Heikki Linnakangas , Michael Paquier , Victor Wagner , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more In-reply-to: <0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593a0bea@proxel.se> References: <20160915153835.GA507447@alvherre.pgsql> <0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593a0bea@proxel.se> Comments: In-reply-to Andreas Karlsson message dated "Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:04:26 +0200" Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:08:49 -0400 Message-ID: <17025.1473977329@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andreas Karlsson writes: > On 09/15/2016 05:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> I suppose some interested party could grab the patch that Heikki >> committed to the new branches and produce a back-patch that can be >> applied to the older branches. > Here is the result of backporting the sum of the two patches on top of > REL9_4_STABLE. Not sure if we need this, but if we do we can apply this > patch. If someone's done the legwork, I think we would be well advised to back-patch. Maybe not bother with 9.1 though. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers