Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieNp7-00044j-Tf for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:31:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieNp5-0007Mv-LH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:31:55 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieNp5-0007Mo-CJ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:31:55 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieNp2-0005k6-J5 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:31:55 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xB9IVl58017265; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:31:47 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: Amit Kapila , Magnus Hagander , Mark Dilger , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test In-reply-to: References: <32745.1575303812@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7221b3b4-fc7f-404d-5cf6-830d3aa6800d@2ndQuadrant.com> <362bca0b-1c1c-c760-ab19-b5d9a14c69ea@gmail.com> <13003.1575391248@sss.pgh.pa.us> <25746.1575436347@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20102.1575675105@sss.pgh.pa.us> <30330.1575739251@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4412.1575748586@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9110.1575824266@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:24:53 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <17263.1575916307.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:31:47 -0500 Message-ID: <17264.1575916307@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Andrew Dunstan writes: > Patch 1 fixed the problems on frogmouth. Cool, thanks. I'll push that in a bit (to the back branches as well as HEAD). > Patch 2 also ran without incident. What do people think about the second patch? I'd only propose that for HEAD, since it's not really a bug fix. regards, tom lane