Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rrjek-002Nmb-58 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:18:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rrjei-00BBcx-Ub for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:18:48 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rrjei-00BBcp-Ku for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:18:48 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rrjeb-000Efl-S5 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:18:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 432JIO0v1732272; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:18:24 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Bertrand Drouvot , shveta malik , Heikki Linnakangas , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Missing LWLock protection in pgstat_reset_replslot() In-reply-to: References: <5e803e21-789d-4399-970f-b6ea56e6df9b@iki.fi> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:33:42 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1732270.1712085504.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 15:18:24 -0400 Message-ID: <1732271.1712085504@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 07:46:26PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Sounds good to me. > I've applied the patch of this thread as b36fbd9f8da1, though I did > not see a huge point in backpatching as at the end this is just a > consistency improvement. I've closed the CF entry for this [1] as committed. Please re-open it if there was something left to do here. regards, tom lane [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4878/