Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sRXKD-00GDAi-GZ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:25:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sRXKB-00596J-8N for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:25:35 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sRXKA-00596B-V3 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:25:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sRXK8-001NP4-3H for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:25:33 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46ADPP0V1732391; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:25:26 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Dave Page cc: Andrew Dunstan , Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: tests fail on windows with default git settings In-reply-to: References: <20240707052030.r77hbdkid3mwksop@awork3.anarazel.de> <625384.1720329973@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20240708201649.qaqllje7vc7eyiix@awork3.anarazel.de> <20240708214421.fxunxj2i34faoxq3@awork3.anarazel.de> <68d948a3-704a-4a0e-a7c9-0591f4ade7ce@dunslane.net> <9b08e271-5ae9-4bf2-b328-9123fceb7b98@dunslane.net> Comments: In-reply-to Dave Page message dated "Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:17:50 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1732389.1720617925.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:25:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1732390.1720617925@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Dave Page writes: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 12:12, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> As I was looking at this I wondered if there might be anywhere else that >> needed adjustment. One thing that occurred to me was that that maybe we >> should replace the use of "-w" in pg_regress.c with this rather less >> dangerous flag, so instead of ignoring any white space difference we would >> only ignore line end differences. The use of "-w" apparently dates back to >> 2009. > That seems like a good improvement to me. +1 regards, tom lane