Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVNvS-0005Hc-BW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 22:49:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVNvR-0005br-6Y for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 22:49:17 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVNvQ-0005bk-R4 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 22:49:16 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVNvO-0006Xp-Jb for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 22:49:15 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xAEMnCfK017667; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:49:12 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: Alvaro Herrera , Justin Pryzby , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Daniel Gustafsson Subject: Re: format of pg_upgrade loadable_libraries warning In-reply-to: <20191114221641.GD6160@momjian.us> References: <20191007174757.GE4732@momjian.us> <20191114190652.GA23586@alvherre.pgsql> <20191114221641.GD6160@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:16:41 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <17665.1573771752.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:49:12 -0500 Message-ID: <17666.1573771752@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> BTW, how is one supposed to "manually upgrade databases that use >> contrib/isb"? This part is not very clear. > I thought you would dump out databases that use isn, drop those > databases, use pg_upgrade for the remaining databases, then load the > dumped database. Attached is a patch that improves the wording. That's better wording, but do we need similar for any of the other not-supported checks? regards, tom lane