Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
Subject: Re: tuple radix sort
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANWCAZYzx7a7E9AY16Jt_U3+GVKDADfgApZ-42SYNiig8dTnFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:18:32 +0800
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
 Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <17F6CDF1-2D93-4C38-B0F2-D52B51F4D167@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANWCAZYzx7a7E9AY16Jt_U3+GVKDADfgApZ-42SYNiig8dTnFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17F6CDF1-2D93-4C38-B0F2-D52B51F4D167%40gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


> On Oct 29, 2025, at 14:28, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> <v1-0001-Use-radix-sort-when-datum1-is-an-integer-type.patch>

I just quick went through the code change. I guess I need more time to =
understand the entire logic, but I find a typo that might effect the =
tests:

```
+	Assert(last =3D first);
```

=E2=80=9C=3D=E2=80=9C should be =E2=80=9C=3D=3D"

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/