Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1etJtD-0006CR-Po for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 21:12:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1etJtC-000329-H9 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 21:12:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1etJtC-00031x-6z for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 21:12:50 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1etJt9-0001We-PA for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 21:12:49 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w26LCipE018046; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:12:44 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Andrew Dunstan , Michael Paquier , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two In-reply-to: <08724398-ce66-9236-18fc-b7f22a15c017@2ndquadrant.com> References: <20180126080026.GI17847@paquier.xyz> <7d040dbb-33f3-edb7-b13d-0f4ab607af46@2ndquadrant.com> <08724398-ce66-9236-18fc-b7f22a15c017@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Tue, 06 Mar 2018 15:13:46 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <18044.1520370764.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:12:44 -0500 Message-ID: <18045.1520370764@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 3/4/18 16:09, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> If you want to do this soon I can put out a Buildfarm Client release >> fairly quickly. > I think the dependency is mostly the other way around. How quickly > would build farm owners install the upgrade? IIUC, the buildfarm script patch is only needed to avoid duplicate tests. So owners need only install it if they want to reduce wasted cycles on their machines. That being the case, it's only urgent to the extent that the individual owner perceives it to be. Some might think it is so, so I'd like to see the BF release available before we push the TAP test ... but we don't have to wait very long between. regards, tom lane