From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold
In-reply-to: <CACJufxH0RxsxUQnAT2AVG08JFpA3C60L91_cEMM8JQd8P=12ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACJufxH0RxsxUQnAT2AVG08JFpA3C60L91_cEMM8JQd8P=12ow@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 18 Sep 2024 21:06:00 +0800"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1807433.1726668657.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 10:10:57 -0400
Message-ID: <1807434.1726668657@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1807434.1726668657%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> writes:
> Can we error out at the stage "create table", "create domain"
> time if the attndims or typndims is larger than MAXDIM (6) ?

The last time this was discussed, I think the conclusion was
we should remove attndims and typndims entirely on the grounds
that they're useless.  I certainly don't see a point in adding
more logic that could give the misleading impression that they
mean something.

			regards, tom lane