Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qFLqq-00024M-HS for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:40:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qFLqp-0002vm-FP for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:40:23 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qFLqp-0002va-6c for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:40:23 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qFLqm-001LTf-MT for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:40:21 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 35ULeIm31817610; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:40:18 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Nathan Bossart cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? In-reply-to: <20230630200509.GA2830328@nathanxps13> References: <20230630200509.GA2830328@nathanxps13> Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Bossart message dated "Fri, 30 Jun 2023 13:05:09 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1817608.1688161218.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:40:18 -0400 Message-ID: <1817609.1688161218@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Nathan Bossart writes: > I'm personally not aware of anyone using this parameter. Might be worth asking on pgsql-general whether anyone knows of active use of this feature. If not, I'm good with killing it. regards, tom lane