Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o8aYx-0004wi-09 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 04:53:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o8aYv-0004Cw-2w for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 04:53:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o8aYu-0004Cn-P1 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 04:53:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o8aYs-0002Vx-EX for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 04:53:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2654rH8g1827178; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 00:53:17 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Peter Geoghegan , Andres Freund , Noah Misch , Robert Haas , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: AIX support - alignment issues In-reply-to: References: <20220702183354.a6uhja35wta7agew@alap3.anarazel.de> <968410.1656789743@sss.pgh.pa.us> <977853.1656794075@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1415825.1656893299@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Tue, 05 Jul 2022 16:38:04 +1200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1827176.1656996797.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:53:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1827177.1656996797@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 12:08 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> I would not stand in the way of dropping HP-UX and IA64 support as of >> v16. (I do still feel that HPPA is of interest, to keep us honest >> about spinlock support --- but that dual-stack arrangement that IA64 >> uses is surely not part of anyone's future.) > I tried to find everything relating to HP-UX, aCC, ia64 and hppa. Or > do you still want to keep the hppa bits for NetBSD (I wasn't sure if > your threat to set up a NetBSD/hppa system was affected by the > hardware failure you mentioned)? No, the hardware failure is that the machine's SCSI controller seems to be fried, thus internal drives no longer accessible. I have a working NetBSD-current installation on an external USB drive, and plan to commission it as a buildfarm animal once NetBSD 10 is officially branched. It'll be a frankencritter of the first order, because USB didn't exist when the machine was built, but hey... regards, tom lane