From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
        Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
        Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
        Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>,
        Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>,
        PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
In-reply-to: <ab7803b4-f985-cf3d-267f-38b7311ca917@postgresql.org>
References: <20200423174343.GA16996@alvherre.pgsql>
 <19233.1587665407@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5561.1587922854@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <13e5e408-bc59-e8ca-44f3-28a981b4fc7d@postgresql.org>
 <a47ea348-b9a0-02b7-5bcb-7a32143dd16f@postgresql.org>
 <11211.1587951842@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <58de9544-be5b-f325-b5cc-cce4e2dda7d9@postgresql.org>
 <5651.1587991781@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <b998a672-2525-1cba-ac64-b292f495919e@postgresql.org>
 <30469.1588087170@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8682.1588202983@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <4894cde4-148d-f0cc-d6d8-182a46f13e1b@postgresql.org>
 <06f6b32d-a4cc-3723-5bc1-00fa674df961@postgresql.org>
 <11106.1588205727@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <1c5ca197-f7f2-0300-46ce-4652c7f81d48@postgresql.org>
 <ab7803b4-f985-cf3d-267f-38b7311ca917@postgresql.org>
Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
	message dated "Wed, 29 Apr 2020 22:04:39 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <18309.1588214299.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 22:38:19 -0400
Message-ID: <18310.1588214299@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
> Please see latest attached. I've eliminated the !important, condensed
> the CSS, and the desultory (yes, my word of the week) testing did not
> find issues in devel or earlier versions.

> Please let me know if this works for you. If it does, I'll push it up to
> pgweb.

NAK ... that does *not* work for me.

It looks to me like you are expecting that "margin" with four parameters
will override an outer-level setting of margin-bottom, but that is not
how my browser is responding.  ISTM you need to explicitly set the very
same parameters in the more-specific rule as in the less-specific rule
that you want to override.

I get reasonable results with these settings, but not with
anything more abbreviated:

#docContent table.table th.func_table_entry p,
#docContent table.table td.func_table_entry p {
  margin-top: 0.1em;
  margin-bottom: 0.1em;
  padding-left: 4em;
  text-align: left;
}

#docContent table.table p.func_signature {
  text-indent: -3.5em;
}

#docContent table.table td.func_table_entry pre.programlisting {
  background-color: inherit;
  border: 0;
  margin-top: 0.1em;
  margin-bottom: 0.1em;
  padding: 0;
  padding-left: 4em;
}

In particular, it might look like the multiple padding settings
in the pre.programlisting rule are redundant ... but they are not, at
least not with Safari.

			regards, tom lane