Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4MD-0001DC-L3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:43:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4MC-00015H-1L for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:43:28 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4MB-000158-O2 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:43:27 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4M9-0005NH-Hz for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:43:26 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 335EhNb61837727; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 10:43:23 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Daniel Gustafsson , Michael Paquier , Justin Pryzby , Mikhail Gribkov , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: GUC for temporarily disabling event triggers In-reply-to: References: <9140106E-F9BF-4D85-8FC8-F2D3C094A6D9@yesql.se> <167482801126.1114.1095311628314619931.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org> <8D26ACC2-7669-460D-833A-582EAD6CC09E@yesql.se> <54E8A181-D611-4581-9CC4-62188D1379C4@yesql.se> <1FF33910-88DB-43B6-AA77-4D04804289FC@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:30:56 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1837725.1680705803.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:43:23 -0400 Message-ID: <1837726.1680705803@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Robert Haas writes: > Maybe we should back up and ask why we need more than "on" and "off". > If somebody is using this feature in any form more than very > occasionally, they should really go home and reconsider their database > schema. +1 ... this seems perhaps overdesigned. regards, tom lane