Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE9F9FB648 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:41:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96012-06 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:41:14 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B219FB276 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:41:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6ADf15h018629; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:41:01 -0400 (EDT) To: Gregory Stark cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" , "Jaime Casanova" , "Jim C. Nasby" , "Bruce Momjian" , "PostgreSQL-patches" Subject: Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert In-reply-to: <87odikzems.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> References: <200705152223.l4FMNJa17969@momjian.us> <464A33AB.1050401@enterprisedb.com> <20070516003810.GI20707@nasby.net> <464B15EF.4000808@enterprisedb.com> <464D96D6.1030608@enterprisedb.com> <457.1184023772@sss.pgh.pa.us> <87odikzems.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> Comments: In-reply-to Gregory Stark message dated "Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:23:23 +0100" Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:41:01 -0400 Message-ID: <18628.1184074861@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/128 X-Sequence-Number: 3126 Gregory Stark writes: > It's pretty serious what you're suggesting since it means that we'll > basically never have a real cluster feature. It seems entirely likely that this is not the way to go about "real clustering". regards, tom lane