From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
        Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>,
        David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>,
        pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+TgmoZ+OPnhE9owE0a0ig7F31-GyJkteTuKj1g3PCWgrD=2LQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMkU=1y2G8VOVBHv3iXU2TMAj7-RyBFFW1uhkr5sm9LQ2=X35g@mail.gmail.com>
 <ce7d8b72-c286-52d1-4a8a-57dba26c2494@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CA+Tgmob-VxZyzUndew2bbzi7_C_yAWk_5qCitQhwjRuwMnSEqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <e18b9bf5-1557-cb9c-001e-0861a1d7dfce@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CA+TgmoZny9Bte4_rYi2S+vGh1TV69NreAHzD6v96tUxryyDn2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFjFpRd+g1fw5EVR7e=BcJP8adY7WjDBq=SZgo6GH4qyaPRq1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoaZDP0ysRqwmP=W4cQr57zN6deNcp0gj_xZw8Czwqf13Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFjFpRfSbaaWyJxaGs5Au1gy3puQ13mTGTGF7Az2FAhi+1QQEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <0700eb97-d9db-33da-4ba2-e28d2a1631d9@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <47f35675-e504-033a-5bbe-185b78b47c3b@pgmasters.net>
 <23a0e23e-853f-5937-a5fd-84e6c869be92@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <79b98e30-4d38-7deb-f1fb-bc0bc589a958@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CAFjFpRfa1q4EY4c6GvC2Kb8jvp75AyNcR-Wr9=hym8J6OoQaMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <b00c8024-b4f3-470b-f911-22a9c81d71ac@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CAFjFpRfPdNDBuw4246Y=mFsY_83=5aku8-2ry+0WdHB9BqaWhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <424933d7-d6bb-4b8f-4e44-1fea212af083@lab.ntt.co.jp> <!
 6008ca34-906f-e61d-478b-8f85fde2c090@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CA+TgmoZ+OPnhE9owE0a0ig7F31-GyJkteTuKj1g3PCWgrD=2LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:32:50 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <18894.1502996341.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:59:01 -0400
Message-ID: <18895.1502996341@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I rebased the patch to HEAD.  PFA a new version of the patch.

> Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
> initially.  Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?

I will, but probably not for a week or so.  Going eclipse-chasing.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers