Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUdfK-0004Cn-2j for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:11:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUdfJ-0001Eu-As for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:11:57 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUddt-000827-Jr for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:10:29 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUddm-0006FQ-CD for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:10:29 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0KIAGKD018899; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:10:16 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Pavan Deolasee cc: pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Pavan Deolasee message dated "Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:53:24 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <18897.1484935816.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:10:16 -0500 Message-ID: <18898.1484935816@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Pavan Deolasee writes: > I see a consistent failure while running "make -C > src/test/modules/commit_ts/ check" on a server compiled with > --enable-tap-tests. This is on the master branch (193a7d791) > ... > Changing the operator to "ne" works for me (patch attached). But I wonder > if this is something specific to my system? Am I using a wrong/stale > version on OSX Sierra? I'm surprised nobody reported this problem earlier. That's just weird. I agree this patch is correct (and I see Alvaro just pushed it), but why isn't the code failing elsewhere? I see no such warning on my RHEL6 box (perl 5.10.1) nor on my OSX Sierra laptop (perl 5.18.2, should be same as yours). Do you have any nondefault Perl modules installed? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers