Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO68z-0005aM-UF for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:57:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO68y-0007N0-Jo for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:57:24 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO68y-0007Mt-D9 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:57:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO68v-0008TQ-Kp for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:57:22 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03DKvJ3n018930; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:57:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: Isaac Morland , PostgreSQL Developers Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? In-reply-to: <18168.1586810511@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us> <12135.1586802423@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18168.1586810511@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:41:51 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <18928.1586811439.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:57:19 -0400 Message-ID: <18929.1586811439@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > "David G. Johnston" writes: >> I don't think having a separate Result column helps. The additional >> horizontal whitespace distances all relevant context information (at least >> on a wide monitor). Having the example rows mirror the Signature row seems >> like an easier to consume choice. > Interesting idea. I'm afraid that it would not look so great in cases > where the example-plus-result overflows one line, which would inevitably > happen in PDF format. Still, maybe that would be rare enough to not be > a huge problem. In most places it'd be a win to not have to separately > allocate example and result space. Actually ... if we did it like that, then it would be possible to treat the signature + description + example(s) as one big table cell with line breaks rather than row-separator bars. That would help address the inadequate-visual-separation-between-groups issue, but on the other hand maybe we'd end up with too little visual separation between the elements of a function description. A quick google search turned up this suggestion about how to force line breaks in docbook table cells: http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/LineBreaks.html which seems pretty hacky but it should work. Anyone know a better way? regards, tom lane