X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB1130F961 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:57:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13262-08 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:57:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D8C30F96B for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:57:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5ODuYQQ018964; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:56:34 -0400 (EDT) To: Joe Conway Cc: Bruce Momjian , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, EG Subject: Re: dblink_ora - a first shot on Oracle ... In-reply-to: <3EF7D566.8020402@joeconway.com> References: <200306231734.h5NHYRP18946@candle.pha.pa.us> <3EF7D566.8020402@joeconway.com> Comments: In-reply-to Joe Conway message dated "Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:36:54 -0700" Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:56:34 -0400 Message-ID: <18963.1056462994@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200306/926 X-Sequence-Number: 40233 Joe Conway writes: > Yeah. But we'd need to detect whether or not the Oracle client libs are > available. I'm not sure how to do that with the contrib build system. > And we'd need a fair amount of integration/reorganizing the existing > code. Also, I've got the same issues with integrating jdbclink. > I don't think I'll be able to get that done between now and July 1st. Seems reasonable to put integrating both of 'em as a TODO for 7.5. I think you're clearly the guy who has to review those patches, so if you don't have time right now, it's not gonna happen for 7.4. regards, tom lane