From: Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>,
 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
 Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
 Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal starting position
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:27:47 +0200
Message-ID: <1914572.usQuhbGJ8B@aivenronan>
Organization: aiven
In-Reply-To: <YXdWvIO52CiT8kg9@paquier.xyz>
References: 
 <CALj2ACW6YA0SfqwPm1-FRRdeNj1e9isiSax3jZ8MmyQYYQQWNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALj2ACXgYg3C1sQPNLAacak1VWQZfSiKfFut2+KWtMD6zYF_WA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YXdWvIO52CiT8kg9@paquier.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1914572.usQuhbGJ8B%40aivenronan>
Precedence: bulk

Le mardi 26 octobre 2021, 03:15:40 CEST Michael Paquier a =E9crit :
> I have changed the patch per Ronan's suggestion to have the version
> check out of GetSlotInformation(), addressed what you have reported,
> and the result looked good.  So I have applied this part.

Thanks !
>=20
> What remains on this thread is the addition of new tests to make sure
> that pg_receivewal is able to follow a timeline switch.  Now that we
> can restart from a slot that should be a bit easier to implemented as
> a test by creating a slot on a standby.  Ronan, are you planning to
> send a new patch for this part?

Yes, I will try to simplify the logic of the patch I sent last week. I'll k=
eep=20
you posted here soon.


=2D-=20
Ronan Dunklau