public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Mark Dilger <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: Joshua Brindle <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Conway <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 13:03:10 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CA+hUKG+LOza8iSLiv6ymn=0R8S0x-R7KaqZmYfY+_b_cubcDOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

Mark Dilger <[email protected]> writes:
> I just got a crash in this test again.  Are you still interested?  I still have the logs.  No core file appears to have been generated.
> The test failure is
> not ok 5 - psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT

Hmm ... I can see one problem with that test:

ok( pump_until(
		$killme,
		$psql_timeout,
		\$killme_stderr,
		qr/WARNING:  terminating connection because of crash of another server process|server closed the connection unexpectedly|connection to server was lost/m
	),
	"psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT");

It's been a little while since that message looked like that.
Nowadays you get

WARNING:  terminating connection because of unexpected SIGQUIT signal
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.

Usually the test would succeed anyway because of matching the
second or third regex alternative, but I wonder if there is
some other spelling of libpq's complaint that shows up
occasionally.  It'd be nice if we could see the contents of
$killme_stderr upon failure.

			regards, tom lane






view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: New Object Access Type hooks
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox