Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aCWqM-0003wI-Hq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:11:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCWqM-0002RV-3u for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:11:58 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCWp1-0000yM-Vi for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:10:36 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCWoz-0004fK-At for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:10:34 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tBPIANAC019323; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 13:10:23 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9GM0LXQsiDQlNC80LjRgtGA0LjQuQ==?= cc: Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 In-reply-to: References: <9F7A592C-323B-40CF-AEB6-20D28EAEFFDD@anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9GM0LXQsiDQlNC80LjRgtGA0LjQuQ==?= message dated "Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:53:13 +0300" Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 13:10:23 -0500 Message-ID: <19322.1451067023@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9GM0LXQsiDQlNC80LjRgtGA0LjQuQ==?= writes: > ​ Samples: 1M of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 816922259995, UID: > pgpro > Overhead Shared Object Symbol > 69,72% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave > 1,43% postgres [.] _bt_compare > 1,19% postgres [.] LWLockAcquire > 0,99% postgres [.] hash_search_with_hash_value > 0,61% postgres [.] PinBuffer Seems like what you've got here is a kernel bug. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers