From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
        pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: snowball release
In-reply-to: <2FDBE3B2-62EB-4F1C-99C6-41F40B76C6ED@yesql.se>
References: <a8eeabd6-2be1-43fe-401e-a97594c38478@2ndquadrant.com>
 <ee42ab86-e661-4a20-1c37-f725985ca4ed@2ndquadrant.com>
 <1941551.1591626785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <2FDBE3B2-62EB-4F1C-99C6-41F40B76C6ED@yesql.se>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
	message dated "Mon, 08 Jun 2020 16:47:01 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1942968.1591629565.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:19:25 -0400
Message-ID: <1942969.1591629565@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
>> we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?

> IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
> but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
> match.  Perhaps we should though?

Looking in the commit logs, our past updates 7b925e127 and
fd582317e just updated that \dFd sample.  So I guess that's the
minimum expectation.  Maybe we should think about having a more
formal list in the actual Snowball section (12.6.6)?

			regards, tom lane