Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkgon-0005ib-31 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 03:29:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkgol-0000Ca-VR for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 03:29:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkgol-0000BZ-Mx for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 03:29:23 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkgoj-0000tW-1o for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 03:29:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x693T0la019573; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 23:29:01 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: David Fetter , Arthur Zakirov , Fabien COELHO , Corey Huinker , PostgreSQL Development Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql In-reply-to: <20190709012917.7ymhvjyivaff3rwh@momjian.us> References: <20190429041106.GB2954@fetter.org> <20190429141710.GD2954@fetter.org> <10811be6-cd8d-eadb-9b70-7a6e72ed4ee5@gmail.com> <20190501073857.GY28936@fetter.org> <11038.1562098250@sss.pgh.pa.us> <27942.1562344682@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190705212903.GF24679@fetter.org> <20190709012917.7ymhvjyivaff3rwh@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Mon, 08 Jul 2019 21:29:17 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <19571.1562642940.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 23:29:00 -0400 Message-ID: <19572.1562642940@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 11:29:03PM +0200, David Fetter wrote: >>> I fixed that, but I'm wondering if we should back-patch that fix >>> or leave the back branches alone. >> +0.5 for back-patching. > Uh, if this was done in a major release I am thinking we have to mention > this as an incompatibility, which means we should probably not backpatch > it. How is "clearly doesn't match the documentation" not a bug? regards, tom lane