Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1gkH8I-00061G-Qq
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:31:34 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1gkH8G-0000oL-9F
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:31:32 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1gkH8F-0000Xd-TH
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:31:32 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1gkH8D-0003uI-FF
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:31:30 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0HNVRRk019617;
	Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:31:27 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu>
cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD
In-reply-to: <e4189457-b0e4-2b0c-0880-f6d086c75378@mksoft.nu>
References: <9427.1547701450@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <e22667cb-ceb1-a6d5-13a4-ced300868631@mksoft.nu>
 <22802.1547759781@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <ad198f3d-957d-9d11-a386-0fae204c3518@mksoft.nu>
 <0a6ece1f-8175-e873-c459-c3a8fd18ad71@mksoft.nu>
 <26513.1547761358@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <1d5a693b-1491-0527-44e8-ac21301f37a8@mksoft.nu>
 <cd736500-332f-994b-f506-126a350f24ee@mksoft.nu>
 <17004.1547763782@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <b7ef913a-78e4-a953-f5c4-f2cec937eabd@mksoft.nu>
 <c9b2e6d3-7ed8-ca52-d697-a9c2af9ff50c@mksoft.nu>
 <aaa8e87c-fd25-6b21-cd97-aee76d6afa88@mksoft.nu>
 <e4189457-b0e4-2b0c-0880-f6d086c75378@mksoft.nu>
Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?=
 <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu>
	message dated "Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:10:01 +0100"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <19615.1547767887.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:31:27 -0500
Message-ID: <19616.1547767887@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Precedence: bulk

=?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu> writes:
> And now also the NetBSD machine failed on pgbenchCheck.

Indeed, as expected.

> should I leave it as it is for now?

Please.  I'll push a fix for the broken test case in a bit --- I
just wanted to confirm that somebody else's machines agreed that
it's broken.

			regards, tom lane