From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
        Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
        Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
 David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
        Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
        Jakub Wartak <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>,
        Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
        pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+hUKG+b2JWLw1MDsVwjOsN351xeawQ46wBA61X0HH9h_hGWAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+hUKGJ1=pOiNjSgXYJnjE3OyRtp8tjMRcON256e5EFpzPpgtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210210215033.GA27507@tamriel.snowman.net>
 <103ec76d-8bbc-09e1-460c-8785751431b5@enterprisedb.com>
 <20210212044614.5wqjkjbcmbwzever@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <20210213213930.GM27507@tamriel.snowman.net>
 <eed83eaa-91e1-91fe-32d0-ece36c0fa810@enterprisedb.com>
 <20210214231815.GO27507@tamriel.snowman.net>
 <17b3f450-048c-f3a6-7086-259523f33cbc@enterprisedb.com>
 <20210317214331.GF20766@tamriel.snowman.net>
 <28c3352e-5388-6410-aae7-05907079e6c9@enterprisedb.com>
 <CA+hUKGLHTjbBPFX6E1ZCGVyQD30-vWtH=N6EcHEzW13q+jh7FQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8dd2dcc2-0b6b-a4ab-c1b3-032c0a5ab1c3@enterprisedb.com>
 <CA+hUKGKmkKfH1h9XG5ctYCgqeOHGdN5bHMoQMZLR=+kLY0PQzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGLsF8sEE+n3qoaV6+XjmYEwYoFVDbLPbYTGz7oGkL=iZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKG+a4wn7B-qBu9SLc1HAbZRSKbp1Ep=rDeveM-UQz84+jg@mail.gmail.com>
 <773932.1619022622@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <b971373e-5f05-e691-d83c-c72a4f67167b@enterprisedb.com>
 <CA+hUKGLQqsNBXXZ6uXFi7L9iqx-4!
 ZSuiAvKiPqDtRQs+yFD9ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGJKDibdw5HzOdgh+tFsA7=wwJ3O6p+qYwbgAD_xkLWA3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOuzzgrn7iKnFRsB4MHp3UisEQAGgZMbk_ViTN4HV4-Ksq8zCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGKLakuWXsHuOXYYYyk-CiZKgcqXgzwKb61d9nrpgn5eww@mail.gmail.com>
 <5B6070FF-5869-4A84-88BC-2D04EDCDB858@yesql.se>
 <CA+hUKGJ7OqpdnbSTq5oK=djSeVW2JMnrVPSm8JC-_dbN6Y7bpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE9k0Pnw7sc9i2RvPkRqOFZz=2B6+ctahDK_SoKq0g0HYD9FMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKG+b2JWLw1MDsVwjOsN351xeawQ46wBA61X0HH9h_hGWAA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:29:52 +1300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1974327.1640755677.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:27:57 -0500
Message-ID: <1974328.1640755677@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1974328.1640755677%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
>> FWIW I don't think we include updates to typedefs.list in patches.

> Seems pretty harmless? And useful to keep around in development
> branches because I like to pgindent stuff...

As far as that goes, my habit is to pull down
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/typedefs.pl
on a regular basis and pgindent against that.  There have been
some discussions about formalizing that process a bit more,
but we've not come to any conclusions.

			regards, tom lane