Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id XAA18771 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 23:57:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA04310; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 23:56:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199808250356.XAA04310@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items In-Reply-To: <25977.904006878@sss.pgh.pa.us> from Tom Lane at "Aug 24, 1998 9: 1:18 pm" To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 23:56:30 -0400 (EDT) Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Bruce Momjian writes: > > With the 6.4 beta just over a week away, here are the open items I see > > for 6.4. We actually have fewer than usual, so that is a good thing. > > I had a few other things on my list: > > * make PGconn,PGresult truly opaque to applications (per recent discussion) > * libpgtcl is missing any way to access PQerrorMessage!? > * remove writable fields in static PQconninfoOptions for thread safety > * bring libpq.sgml documentation fully up to speed > > (I'm willing to do the above four, but am not promising that the doco > will get done before Sept 1. I think Thomas indicated that Sept 15 > is OK for docs?) Sounds good to me. > > * put UNLISTEN in standard backend, fix libpgtcl listen support to use it > > I would really like to see this in 6.4, because I need UNLISTEN in my > applications. Thomas had volunteered to add the needed parser support > for UNLISTEN (the execution function already exists, it just needs a > statement that can call it). As far as I've heard he hasn't gotten to > it yet. I can fix libpgtcl but do not want to touch it unless the > underlying backend support is there. > > * psql: control-c ought to stop lengthy output > * psql's \z output truncates table names at 16 chars > * psql and libpgtcl insert unexpected backslashes in output data > > I was going to work on these but it's looking like they will not make > the Sept 1 cut. Anyone else want to do them? Not really sure anyone else knows those areas. I am surprised by the psql \z. Of course, if you add the "features" now, you can fix the bugs during beta. > > > > change pg args for platforms that don't support argv changes > > (setproctitle()?, sendmail hack?) > > I'd like to see this in there too, and will work on it if no one else > does, but I rather doubt I can get to it by Sept 1. Maybe this will > have to wait for 6.5, or 6.4.1, or something. Again, can be done later. Will be a problem without the fix. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)