Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA09272 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:34:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id WAA18868; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:32:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199809230232.WAA18868@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items In-Reply-To: <3608778C.DC6D2670@rbbsystems.com> from Nick Bastin at "Sep 22, 1998 10:23: 4 pm" To: nbastin@rbbsystems.com (Nick Bastin) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:32:54 -0400 (EDT) Cc: hackers@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > allow chaining of pages to allow >8k tuples > > How transparent is this going to be? Am I going to need to specify that a > table needs to be 'chainable', or is it just going to do it when I create > tables that can have records containing >8k of data? I have several databases > that I would like to move over to a postgres backend from 4th Dimension, but > many tables have the potential of creating tuples greater than 8k. > > Thanks, > Nick > Automatically. We have had no one offer to do it, yet. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 http://www.op.net/~candle | (610) 353-9879(w) + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 853-3000(h) + Christ can be your backup. |