Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA07120 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 09:52:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id JAA19719; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 09:52:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199810221352.JAA19719@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? In-Reply-To: from Jan Wieck at "Oct 22, 1998 10:53:10 am" To: jwieck@debis.com Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 09:52:14 -0400 (EDT) Cc: jwieck@debis.com, Inoue@tpf.co.jp, hackers@postgreSQL.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL47 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Jan, we found that I am having to require an initdb for the INET/CIDR > > type, so if you want stuff to change the views/rules for the limit > > addition post 6.4, please send them in and I will apply them. > > > > You clearly have the syntax down, so I think you should go ahead. > > This is the part that will enable post 6.4 add of the > LIMIT stuff without initdb. > > Regression tested. Applied. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026