Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA36442 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 13:57:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id NAA23592; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 13:55:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199909131755.NAA23592@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 In-Reply-To: <37DD3969.BEEE3FEC@wgcr.org> from Lamar Owen at "Sep 13, 1999 01:50:33 pm" To: Lamar Owen Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 13:55:09 -0400 (EDT) CC: Oleg Bartunov , "pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL56 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > The bad news is that those patches are too large/significant for a minor > > release. They could affect other platforms adversely, so we can't apply > > them until 6.6. > > Ok, mung time, then. That means RedHat will be releasing 6.5.1 with > RedHat 6.1, unless those patches can be munged relatively easily. Alpha > is a big platform for RedHat. > It would be very valid to apply Uncle George's patches to a 6.5.2 alpha-only release. If we had an alpha-only release, we would apply them too. Our problem is that minor releases don't get the same cross-platform testing as major releases. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026