Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA95634D27 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:32:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32840-07 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:32:10 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-bw0-f169.google.com (mail-bw0-f169.google.com [209.85.218.169]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3E5632550 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:32:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so583317bwz.19 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:32:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=663b56phm55lcdnU4tBvoiNdN2XABaRhZ0QQruxtkFU=; b=n8A1syr1fsXgE57IoZWMkZQ54+c6+RbRB4QVoAJs/E8QAv+4sFIzRJr4+HF8lfjr6m 6JPWAz2W6Pjo7H7jY/GHxWvJ/tU5Rk4gGcZwshjl/+QUp7/oyEonF6DaqkRYOEROFKcD d8hDCPHwrms65/roalHXnfa4FyaiFUx44hi3s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SCQtUOzGD/RhGdguq0D5Fk+yQBS2RO6cGUpsYqvdR8j4ws/9WPU+gEsWwpA2to7iYX kh8yMJRjRwth7oQ+6A8++z04czruWJvRF7gosaqwBZdCnY6N2zUmQhTm55qV7etvfWRG PYVYoAyk0VCiHwwTDPAZIBKVWKr5wsEQ2AW50= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.110.144 with SMTP id n16mr350951fap.55.1238052729722; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:32:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3f0b79eb0903251851v5936d6b4x49997ac8f04b98b9@mail.gmail.com> References: <3f0b79eb0903242329j12865d55s348f5c873a956e71@mail.gmail.com> <1d4e0c10903242350i505a9f6bsa7ba347dc02f90b6@mail.gmail.com> <3f0b79eb0903250144k453b3927mffa8b08678ed057b@mail.gmail.com> <1d4e0c10903250155w34bd79dcvfab2ad5c95e56011@mail.gmail.com> <49C9F255.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> <1d4e0c10903250848x4e067c86ue611c0c50f25e49d@mail.gmail.com> <3f0b79eb0903251851v5936d6b4x49997ac8f04b98b9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:32:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1d4e0c10903260032v767da1fdg6cf7cea86c64cc45@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby From: Guillaume Smet To: Fujii Masao Cc: Kevin Grittner , pgsql-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.14 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.140 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/1033 X-Sequence-Number: 135711 On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: > What does "the default" mean? You mean that new trigger should use > the existing trigger option character (-t)? Yes, that's my point. I understand it seems weird to switch the options but I'm pretty sure a lot of persons currently using -t would be surprised by the current behaviour. Moreover playing all the remaining WALs before starting up should be the most natural option when people are looking in the help. That said, it would be nice to hear from people really using pg_standby to know if they understand how it works now and if it's what they intended when they set it up. -- Guillaume