public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql casts aspersions on server reliability
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 04:06:22 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CA+TgmoZYvqmyQpzSUdtDmtk4Aj94MppDGe9qVJczbPLy4G2Yfg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 11:12 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:25:14PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Yes, you are correct. Here is a patch that implements the FATAL test,
> > though I am not sure I have the logic correct or backwards, and I don't
> > know how to test this. Thanks.
>
> I developed the attached patch which seems to work better. In testing
> kill -3 on a backend or calling elog(FATAL) in the server for a
> session, libpq's 'res' is NULL, meaning we don't have any status to
> check for PGRES_FATAL_ERROR. It is very possible that libpq just isn't
> stuctured to have the PGRES_FATAL_ERROR at the point where we issue this
> message, and this is not worth improving.
>
> test=> select pg_sleep(100);
> --> FATAL: FATAL called
>
> server closed the connection unexpectedly
> --> This probably means the server terminated null
> before or while processing the request.
> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Succeeded.
I don't thing "terminated null" is a meaningful message.
> libpq_append_conn_error(conn, "server closed the connection unexpectedly\n"
> - "\tThis probably means the server terminated abnormally\n"
> - "\tbefore or while processing the request.");
> + "\tThis probably means the server terminated%s\n"
> + "\tbefore or while processing the request.",
> + (conn->result == NULL) ? " null" :
> + (conn->result->resultStatus == PGRES_FATAL_ERROR) ?
> + "" : " abnormally");
Apart from the weird "null", will that work well for translation?
> --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c
> +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c
> @@ -2158,6 +2158,7 @@ pqFunctionCall3(PGconn *conn, Oid fnid,
> if (pqGetErrorNotice3(conn, true))
> continue;
> status = PGRES_FATAL_ERROR;
> + fprintf(stderr, "Got 'E'\n");
> break;
> case 'A': /* notify message */
> /* handle notify and go back to processing return values */
That looks like a leftover debugging message.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
view thread (6+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql casts aspersions on server reliability
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox